So, is false news a security concern? Let’s take a look at the latest news item.
Mostly fake news creators spread the news of horror or haunting places. They want to make peoples afraid by the demon names or necromancer names. You may heard these kinds of news on news channels or from other peoples as well.
Facebook has hosted a news conference explaining what they are doing to remove non-existent news from its pages and therefore in our feed. CNN’s Oliver Darcy was expected to ask a specific question about one of the most notable non-fiction sources, Info Wars.
Asked by Darcy how the company could claim to be sensitive to the problem of false online information while simultaneously allowing InfoWars to keep a page with nearly a million followers on its website, John Hegeman said the company “does not remove false news.”
“I think it’s a lie that doesn’t violate public policy,” Hegeman said, explaining that Info Wars “did not violate anything that could lead to their downfall.”
Hegeman added, “I think part of the important thing here is that we have made Facebook a place where different people can have a voice. And different publishers have very different ideas.”
“We are working hard to find the right balance between promoting free speech and promoting a safe and real community, and we believe low-level content hits that balance. In other words, we allow people to post you as a way to comment, but we won’t show you up in the News Feed.”
“That means: while sharing false news does not violate Community Standards policies, we have strategies in place to deal actors who frequently share false news. and have significantly reduced the distribution of all their content at the page or domain level on Facebook. “
Therefore, based on that conversation you should ask yourself if the press conference on false news was nothing else, otherwise, false news!
If Facebook does not intend to reduce the number of false stories it promotes, it claims to remove or reduce the page owners’ ability to monetize Facebook if they look for fake news sellers.
How does this affect security Problems arise when those who truly believe a false story begin to share it.
It’s one thing to allow and promote free speech, but once it starts to affect the legitimate business those in trouble need to be booked. InfoWars had previously advertised its site and even its non-YouTube advertising news. When those ads are displayed in the middle of an item from a reputable company it results in a slight reduction in the reputation of these firms.
Some of the largest brands in the U.S. It contained ads that served on YouTube’s most infamous InfoWars channels and its founder, well-known conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, and they said they were unaware that YouTube allowed their advertising to appear there. – CNN
And in the Fake News article, take a look at the person who coined the phrase:
President Trump rejected a question from CNN’s Jim Acosta at a press conference held Friday afternoon with UK Prime Minister Theresa May in Buckinghamshire. Earlier at a press conference, Trump attacked CNN after receiving a question from NBC News reporter Hallie Jackson. Trump said NBC was “probably worse than CNN.”
“Mr. President, since you attacked CNN, can I ask you a question?” Acosta asked Trump.
FOX News reporter John Roberts “Continue” said.
“Can I ask you a question?” Jim Acosta insisted.
“No,” Trump said.
“CNN is a fake news,” Trump said. “I don’t take questions from CNN. CNN is a fake news. I don’t take questions from CNN.”
So in this case those accused of bringing false news are not given the opportunity to ask a question! If the media publishes a false story you have the opportunity to challenge them in a court of law, but POTUS does not bother to do so, instead presenting its own justice.
What is a security penalty?
Honestly, this is detrimental, the media in the United Kingdom has a responsibility to report honestly and impartially, failure to do so leads to court action almost always. Trump has accused the BBC of clearing out false stories in the past, now I know the BBC has been accused of bias in the past, in some cases they have been found guilty and had to pay a price, however, they are funded by the UK public using license fees and as a result are under investigation.
Whenever public opinion is used there is a security risk, either cyber or personal. The current trend of calling anything people do not like as fake rather than bringing criminals into the book must change in the real world and in the cyber environment.
As a result, lies continue to spread and global security and cyber security are at the forefront of suffering.
Facebook recently tried to reduce the limit following a Cambridge Analytica complaint. UK advertising is rife with how Facebook discards its third-party data partnership, in fact there may be a second reason for this. The GDPR could make a third party data partnership like Cambridge Analytica one into a mining site for Facebook.
The amount of compliance that will be required, documentation, review and verification can be penalized if something goes wrong can be high.
Indeed, Facebook has received a fine of only $ 500,000 for the recent scandal, this may be because the incident took place before the GDPR took effect, future violations will be dealt with with hefty fines.
What can be done?
It seems that unless the party involved puts the offender in court, the response may not be much. Anyway?
The lesson to be learned here is that according to Facebook, they will not discount the wrong news even after they have received it. Society is therefore in a position of power.
Do not believe everything you read. You can use websites like https://www.snopes.com/ which provide many resources for scams and issues. You can also check the facts at https://fullfact.org/ to check the authenticity of the story.
If you find that this story is not true, make sure you point it out respectfully to the person (s) you are promoting.
Why is this so important? Yes, there are extremely successful tricks that bad people often use, simply to look at popular news styles, create pages that promote those stories or hijack existing pages and embed their malicious code on the page. Before you know it malware is spreading all over the internet infecting thousands or millions of computers.
In summary, false news creates real cyber security problems and can be very dangerous in the real world.